Brussels pushing for forests in global climate deal
EurActiv.com, 20 October 2008 -
The European Commission will push for an international commitment to end global forest cover loss by 2030 as part of a new 'forestry package' that proposes new rules to prevent illegal logging while testing the inclusion of forest credits in a global carbon market.
The package, presented by EU Environment Commissioner Stavros Dimas in Brussels on 17 October, comes amid growing calls to include forest and deforestation issues in the global fight against climate change.
The value of standing trees
Selling timber and the land on which it is harvested remains a far more lucrative enterprise than keeping trees standing. Brussels hopes that a new global fund, known as the Global Forest Carbon Mechanism (GFCM), could provide developing countries the incentives necessary to undertake actions against deforestation.
Under the plans, the EU ETS would be a major source of funding for the GFCM, whereby 5% of auctioning revenues could provide up to €2.5 billion for the fund by 2020. Governments that sign up to a global climate change deal could also be allowed to use so-called deforestation credits towards their individual CO2 reduction commitments under a pilot scheme. Companies might then be allowed to use the system after 2020, subject to a review of the initial phase, the Commission said.
Based on announcements made on 17 October, the EU executive would then use this system as a basis to push for an international commitment to halt global forest cover loss by 2030, with a 50% reduction in tropical forest destruction by 2020.
Due diligence
Under the Commission's new proposal for a framework regulation on illegal logging, traders of forestry products will need to make "sufficient guarantees that the timber and timber products they sell have been harvested according to the relevant laws of the country of origin," according to a press statement.
Brussels hopes this sort of due diligence obligation on traders will "send a strong message to operators wanting to access the EU market". It will be up to EU member states to decide on any penalty regimes, or even prison sentences, for traders who breach the rules.
Positions
UK Green MEP Caroline Lucas slammed the proposal on logging as "toothless and inadequate to stop the influx of illegally logged timber into the EU". But the MEP commended the Commission's "clarity of thought" in its communication on deforestation.
The pulp and paper industry did not react positively to the plans.
"The current Commission proposal focuses only on wood using industries in Europe and therefore addresses the symptoms of illegal logging without dealing with its root causes. This is discriminatory to the forest sector in Europe in an already difficult economic context," Teresa Presas, managing director of the Confederation of European Paper Industries (CEPI), said in a statement
The European Federation of Parquet Importers (EFPI), meanwhile, is concerned that the proposed regulation on illegal logging will turn market players into public authorities and put the burden of proof "at the wrong end of the supply chain".
"The objective of the proposal would therefore not be attained," the federation said in a press statement.
NGOs also criticised the plans.
"The EU has finally recognised the need for legislation to address the trade in products from illegally sourced timber, However, the draft proposal presented today does not have the teeth needed to seriously clamp down on this trade," the WWF 's Anke Schulmeister said in a statement.
The WWF also "denounces" the Commission's "lack of ambition" with respect to securing a global pledge to reduce deforestation, since Brussels is calling for a 50% reduction rather than a complete halting of deforestation by 2020.
Greenpeace lamented that "the Commission's proposal for this law will not help European consumers know if the flat-pack wardrobe they bought last Saturday is the result of forest crime," the group's forest policy director Sebastien Risso said in a statement.
Greenpeace is also against including forestry credits in an emissions trading regime on the grounds that it would undermine the carbon market without benefiting forests.
Links
European Union
Parliament
Business & industry
International organizations
NGOs
Press articles
Other
This article is reproduced with kind permission of EurActiv.com
Visit EurActiv.com for
more news and articles and
sign up to EurActiv.com's Update
E-mail
|
Please note:
This article is for information purposes only. The WBCSD does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any information provided. |
|

 |
 |
 |
 |
| Author |
 |
 |
EurActiv.com |
 |
 |
 |
| Publication Date |
 |
 |
20 Oct 2008 |
 |
 |
 |
| Document Type |
 |
 |
News articles
|
 |
 |
 |
| Issue/Topic |
 |
 |
Energy & Climate Forest Products
|
 |
 |
 |
| Region |
 |
 |
Europe
|
 |
 |
 |
| Source |
 |
 |
EurActiv.com
|
 |
 |
 |
| Include In RSS |
 |
 |
Business & Sustainable Development News Energy & Climate News
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|